Tuesday, April 18, 2006

"Strenous" Advocacy

Somehow, I don't think this is what is meant by going to the matt for your client:
COMES NOW counsel for Defendant, through his [sic] and respectfully requests this [c]ourt to Order a fistfight between [] . . . and [Defendant's counsel]
This was actually filed in court, though was later (wisely?) withdrawn. Link via Anderson with more (and darker) info here.

In other law-type news, I received my license today. It's smaller than I imagined it would be...
at

6 comments:

  1. slickdpdx4/18/2006 3:07 PM

    Congratulations!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ahistoricality4/18/2006 3:57 PM

    Congratulations indeed.

    I think the fistfight might be a really nice addition to binding arbitration; not to determine who wins, but for emotional "closure"

    Of course, I think dueling should be legal....

    ReplyDelete
  3. reader_iam4/18/2006 7:07 PM

    Congrats, Pooh! Another milestone achieved.

    I hope you're out celebrating and not reading my little comment.

    ; )

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous4/18/2006 11:18 PM

    Let me pile on some:

    Congratulations!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mr Furious4/19/2006 6:53 AM

    Yeah, one from me too...

    Congratulations!

    [take it on down to Kinko's and have 'em blow it up into wallpaper!]

    ReplyDelete
  6. Pooh4/19/2006 4:50 PM

    No sir, the great state of Minnesota! Ski-u-mah, my friends...

    I'm guessing the jury box is really your first courtroom experience, J?

    ReplyDelete