Tuesday, January 24, 2006

AHW: The Winner is Not

Truly a bumper crop this week, so I felt the need to give some recognition to those that may have been worthy in a different week.

  • Joel Stein and Rick Santorum - for crassest use of the troops in search of a punchline and political cover, respectively.
  • Not unrelatedly, myself for throwing XWL under the bus by feeding him to angry Balloon Juice lefties over his take on the above-linked Stein piece. Twice.
  • Ron Artest. You can't demand a trade...and then nix the trade they work out. You just can't do that. People might start thinking you're crazy if you keep this mess up...Though personally, I think this trade sucks for the Pacers. I think Peja would make them worse. But, if they feel they need a decaying, one-dimensional, soft, smelly player who is decidedly non-clutch in the playoffs, who am I to argue?
4. You

Charges: Silently enabling and contributing to the irreversible destruction of your planet. Absolving yourself of your responsibility to do anything about it that your immediate neighbors don’t. Assuming that it’s normal behavior to spend several hours each day totally inert and staring into a cathode ray tube. Substituting antidepressants for physical motion. Caring more about the personal relationships of people you will never meet than your own. Shrugging your shoulders at the knowledge that your government is populated by criminal liars intent on fooling you into impoverished, helpless submission. Cheering this process on.

Exhibit A: You don’t even know who your congressman is.

Sentence: Deathbed realization that your entire life was an unending series of stupid mistakes and wasted opportunities, a priceless gift of potential extravagantly squandered, for which you deserve nothing but scorn or, at best, indifference, and a cold, meaningless demise.
I do too know who my congressman is. I resent that part of it.

For two guys watching history unfold, my father and I weren't exactly high-fiving in the living room or anything. The game made me feel the same way I felt while watching "March of the Penguins." I had always wondered what a penguin's life was like; once I knew how depressing it was, I wanted to sit in my garage with the car running. Sometimes it's almost better not to know these things. And Kobe's 81-point game was a little like that. For a perimeter player to score that many points, you have to hog the ball to a degree that's almost disarming to watch; it almost stops resembling a basketball game. More than Kobe's rising point total, Dad and I found ourselves fascinated by his icy demeanor, the lack of excitement by the guys on the Lakers bench, even the dysfunctional way that his teammates were killing themselves going for rebounds and steals to get him more shots.

. . .

When an exhausted Kobe reached 81 and appeared barely able to stay on his feet, the Lakers removed him to a standing ovation, as well as half-hearted hugs and high-fives from his teammates (all of whom will be disciplined this week from Mitch Kupchak for not celebrating joyously enough). The best reaction belonged to Jackson, who seemed amused, supportive and somewhat horrified, like how Halle Berry's husband probably looked after sitting through his first screening of "Monster's Ball." The second-best reaction belonged to my Dad, who listened to Kobe's postgame interview with Patrick O'Neal and excitedly said, "Wait, how can you score 81 points and not thank your teammates?" Not since Hilary Swank snubbed then-husband Chad Lowe at the 2000 Oscars have we seen something that blatantly egocentric. And look how they turned out.
Grossly unfair? Absolutely. Of course, I feel the same way myself...

Winner tommorow, I promise.

Remiss in Not Ripping Greg Paulus Sooner

Fletcher reminds me that I have not discussed Doooooks loss to G'Town on Saturday. He's right, mostly because I only saw the last 8 minutes. Saturday morning + 4 hour time difference will do that. I will say that from what I saw, 2 of the 3 "Duke losing" conditions were met. Sheldon had fould trouble and 4 points. Paulus may have scored 14, but he was awful, several big TO's and got burned repeatedly on D. JJ was slightly better than the 4-15 I would have predicted (41 is ok, though ho-hum this week...), but he made many, many whiny faces (especially after Paulus tried to slalom dribble through the GT coaching staff instead of getting Shooter the ball down 3)

Hopefully this satisfies my responsibilities. But Fletch, I know you're a former DC denizens, but 'Horns or Hoyas, pick one...

Game. Set.

I haven't said much about the whole NSA wiretapping thing here for a few reasons. First, I'm slightly tired of it. Second, at least 4 blogs I visit regularly discuss it with frequency, so if I want to head-butt a wall, I know where to go. Third, the legal issue is pretty clear, and pretty clearly defined (W broke the law unless the law can't apply to him). Fourth, I just get pissed off by the false characterization of my position as objectively pro-terrorist, or some such nonsense. It's ridiculous. It's mendacious, and it's whole purpose is to defect attention from the meritless arguments for legality. Finally, others are much better at taking blowtorches to the fatuous defenses being offered on a daily basis.

Glenn Greenwald, in particular, has made a habit of returning the administrations shots, with interest. Today he makes like Roger Federer on the latest talking points:

So as of June, 2002 -- many months after the FISA bypass program was ordered -- the DoJ official who was responsible for overseeing the FISA warrant program was not aware (at least when he submitted this Statement) of any difficulties in obtaining warrants under the FISA "probable cause" standard, and for that reason, the Administration would not even support DeWine's amendment. If - as the Administration is now claiming - they had such significant difficulties obtaining the warrants they wanted for eavesdropping that they had to go outside of FISA, surely Baker - who was in charge of obtaining those warrants - would have been aware of them. And, if the Administration was really having the problems under FISA, they would have supported DeWine's Amendment. But they didn't.

The second concern the Administration expressed with DeWine's amendment was that it was quite possibly unconstitutional:

The Department's Office of Legal Counsel is analyzing relevant Supreme Court precedent to determine whether a "reasonable suspicion" standard for electronic surveillance and physical searches would, in the FISA context, pass constitutional muster. The issue is not clear cut, and the review process must be thorough because of what is at stake, namely, our ability to conduct investigations that are vital to protecting national security. If we err in our analysis and courts were ultimately to find a "reasonable suspicion" standard unconstitutional, we could potentially put at risk ongoing investigations and prosecutions.

By that time, the Administration had already been engaging in eavesdropping outside of the parameters of FISA, and yet the DoJ itself was expressing serious doubts about the constitutionality of that eavesdropping and even warned that engaging in it might harm national security because it would jeopardize prosecutions against terrorists. Put another way, the DoJ was concerned that it might be unconstitutional to eavesdrop with a lower standard than probable cause even as the Administration was doing exactly that.

Emphasis mine. Read the whole thing if so inclined.

Update via Louise:

AG Gonzales gave a speech defending the NSA program at Georgetown law today. It did not go quite according to plan:

But as the attorney general tried to convey that the extraordinary circumstances of the September 11, 2001, terror attacks justified the program, the protesters turned to one of America's Founding Fathers for their rebuttal.


"Those who would sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither" -- a paraphrase of a quote attributed to Benjamin Franklin -- had been scrawled in capital letters on a sign that required four protesters to hold it up.


Gonzales didn't acknowledge the sign nor did he stop his speech as 22 protesters, including the four with the sign, stood with their backs to him during the address. Five protesters left the room during the speech.

Good on you, kids. (Photos via AP by way of Dependable Renegade.)

This Is Stupid

For those of you who don't know, the New York Times is trying to squeeze every last drop from these here internets by requiring a subscription few for "premium content" (sports, news, op-eds). Leaving aside the question that "the New York Times does sports?" and why someone would need to pay for this info since every other daily paper in creation is free on the web, the results have been underwhelming, so they've started a blog to discuss what to change about the service...and put it behind the subscription firewall. Apparently, the business manager went to B-school with the record exec who greenlighted CD's that don't work in CD players. My gramma, whose VCR is blinking 12:00 as we speak, could do a better job taking advantage of the digital medium.


(H/T: Andrew Sullivan)

Don't Drive Angry

Or at least don't blog when caffeinated and annoyed. XWL, are we still friends, post rant?

Update: XWL has graciously updated and clarified. I thank him for that, though I think he is mistaken as to the Afghanistan issue. I don't know where this idea comes from that the Democratic base does not like to blow things up real good. We too are children of Castle Wolfenstein, GoldenEye and Halo, (though Missile Command was always my favorite, back in the day. Well, that and Super DodgeBall. When you get down to it, largely the same game with different animations. But I digress...) I'd like to think that we would have managed to catch OBL in Tora Bora and put his head on the proverbial pike. Giving credit where it is due, aside from the above snafu, Afghanistan is the one Bush policy that can be viewed as largely succesful to my mind - the people seem to be for us about 7-1 (sorry, no link, read a poll to that effect somewhere yesterday.)

Monday, January 23, 2006

GonzagaBlog

Been awhile since I checked in on The 'Stache. How has it stayed the same wispy length for two months?


Anyway, Morrison has 16 with 10:28 left in the first. No wait, he just found the DoubleDribble hotspot, faded out of bounds and hit from 23. 19 with 9:30 in the 1st.



Update: He just pulled up from off the screen with a guy in his face. 24 at the 8:00 timeout.



Ok, he took a three minute blow, back in with 5:08. Still has 24.

During a TV timeout, via Deadspin, an open letter to Kobe. From Luke Ridnour.

Back to A-Mo. Couple throws with 2:08 left, 26 for the half. This is actually a decent game aside from the StacheFactor.

Erg, missed about 4 straight shots to end the half Zags 45 San Francisco 40. How are you going to get 60 if you keep missing these off-balance runners, Adam?

Second Half: We just learned that J.P. Batista bench presses 330. Which means 20 pounds less than Earl Boykins. Zero points for our guy in the first 5 minutes of half number 2. Yawn.

12:32 - tough pull-up to stop a USF run 53-52 Zags, 28 for AM.

11:05 - 2 guys hanging on him, andone from 12. Big shot. Oh boy, Larry Bird highlights during the timeout. Simmer. Down. FT gives him 31. 58-54 Zags.

10:00 - Egregious push off leads to an offensive rebound, and a tear drop half hook in traffic. 33. 60-54

2:57 Left - Tough 8 foot baseline runner gives him 37. 71-65 Zags.

0:12.6 to go - 41 for Stache as he leaves with the zags up 9. After Kobe, I'm disappointed he ended up with 41. 84-75, Zags, final.

Cheerful

Belated congrats to the sharp-minded (and even sharper-tongued) Frankie for not letting the bastards get her down and getting her PhD. Good work, doc.

Apple 1. Sony - [LotsnLots]

After complaints arose concerning the "phone home" feature on the iTunes mini-store, it took the company a whopping 2 weeks to address the problem:
The Cupertino, California-based company last Tuesday switched the so-called "MiniStore" feature to give users the choice of turning it on, rather than having it automatically activate with its new version update of iTunes.

The company introduced the recommendation feature two weeks ago. The MiniStore window pane with music or video suggestions pops up as users play songs from their libraries.
As opposed to Sony and the rest of the RIAA hacks, who say nothing or actively try to cover up the problem. Listening to the customer (who, incidentally, pays your salary): Brilliant!

Putting an Old Dog Down

Yesterday, we learned that this season will be The West Wing's last. Given the declining ratings and changed time slot (it's rarely a good sign for a show when its slot gets changed, especially when they move it from a glamour spot like Wednesday night to the wasteland of Sunday evening), this is hardly a surprise, and given John Spencer's death last month seemed inevitable.

While I'm sad to see the show go, it is not that much of a loss in its present state. Ever since Aaron Sorkin and Tommy Schlamme left after the 4th season (leaving us with that egregious "24"ish cliffhanger) the show has only fitfully reached the heights of the first four seasons. In fact, were I to pick my top ten episodes, there is exactly one from the last season which makes the list:

10. The Midterms. First episode after the two-part season two premiere. Not really a great episode overall, but Bartlett's ending rant against a "Christian" radio host was not only good tv, but more or less encapsulates the way I feel about much of organized religion.

9. Celestial Navigation. Season 1, Josh's Secret Plan to Fight Inflation, Toby and Sam have to bail an angry Supreme Court nominee out of jail. Hijinks ensue.

8. In Excelsis Deo. Season 1 Christmas. The homeless guy with Toby's jacket gets found. Would be higher if I hadn't seen it 300 times, I think. Bonus points for Lt. Daniels from "The Wire" (or the actor, Lance Reddick) making an appearance.

7. Two Cathedrals. I always thought the show was best when it used flashbacks, and the young Bartlet + Ms. Landingham bit was priceless. Martin Sheen got to use his Latin, which is always nice. Good non-cliffhanger cliffhanger as well (If you payed attention, of course he's running again.

6. The Supremes. The best post-Sorkin Episode. Of course, hard to go too far wrong with Glenn Close and William Fichtner as your fictional Supreme Court nominees. Fichtner's character is what the optimist in me hopes John Roberts to be.

5. Isaac and Ishamel. The post 9-11 special episode. Good enough on its own merits, but when you add in that it went from concept to airing in under 3 weeks, a pretty amazing accomplishment.

4. In The Shadow of Two Gunmen. Season 2 premiere. Ok it's really two episodes. So I cheated. But the flashbacks of how the band gets together are fun, especially C.J.'s diatribe at the studio head. Wherein I find it appropriate to mention that movie sales are down because the movies, "they were all bad."

3. Bartlet for America. Leo's best episode, and essentially the Christmas episode from season 3. Bittersweet watching it now, even moreso listening to the DVD commentary track featuring John Spencer, who's personal history gave him some insight into Leo's relapse. Nice payoff from "Noel", a guy falls into a hole.

2. Noel - Season 2 Christmas episode. Or "The One with Yo-Yo Ma". Even without the Josh needs therapy plotline, Yo-Yo Ma is in it.

1. Holy Night - The Christmas episode from season 4. The one where Toby's dad shows, the ex-gangster, shows up to visit. Sorkin always brought the big guns to bear on the Christmas Episodes (all 4 are represented here) yet this was the best.



Update: Via Jake, WaPo has a piece on the show coming to an end:
Martin Sheen, who has played our fantasy president for seven seasons, was asked to reflect on what the show has meant to the country over the years.

"We can be very cynical about the people that lead us," he said, adding that he hoped the show managed "to make people realize that being a public servant is an honor . . . and that so many good and decent people do it and never get any credit."

"We were a fantasy but we had a parallel universe to reality," he continued. That changed radically, he said, when the Bush administration came into office and then 9/11 happened and "the country moved much further away from the center and we felt we were dead in the center and we gave everyone a fair shot."

Sunday, January 22, 2006

81?

81!

On 46 shots.* In a game that was competitive until he had about 65 upon further review, at least 72. I still hate you,** Mamba, but respect. Since the suspension for neck-boning Mike Miller, Kobe is averaging 45.5 on 49% shooting. I can really only echo XWL and say "Sick". Oh, and apparently, suck it Bill Simmons.



There must have been something in the water tonight, as both FrodoLuke Ridnour and Raja Bell scored 30+. (In what looks like it was a phenomenal game)


*Generally speaking 1.3 or so points per shot attempt is acceptable. Over 1.7, over a large number of shots, is ludicrous.

** especially since you've apparently convinced the LeBrons that wearing tights is ok. You wear shorts to play basketball. Otherwise, how would the fans know that you shaved your legs before the game? (Not that there's anything...)

A Book Bleg

In pursuit of of my book-a-week goal...I need suggestions for books. I'm fine as far as finding sports or literature/fiction. But I'd like tips for good starting places on a topic I'd like to read more: Philosophy and/or political philosophy. I have a hard enough time unpacking why I think what I think, and trying to figure out how people who disagree with me come to their conclusions is a worthwhile undertaking, I feel. So, fire away.

A Few Changes

Since blogger doesn't let you do categories (or, if you do it, it's "terrifyingly super-kludgy" according to my nerdier friends, whatever that means), I'm trying to do a little housekeeping by backlinking through the topic headings to the right. So, if you really care about the music I was listening to in, say mid-October, it will be easier to find.

Plus I have just a touch of OCD...

Carry on.

Outed

Sebby outs both the Kaiser and myself. As drinkers of non-manly beverages. At least I won't get locked up for anonymously naming people Asshole of the week.

(cross posted at 6'2")

Glory Road: Best. Drinking Game Movie. Ever.

Have you ever gone on a long road trip and passed some of the time playing some sort of "name game"? How about the "cliche game", which resembles the interaction between Lt. Kaffee and Luther the Kiosk Guy in A Few Good Men?

Well, if you recognize that experience, then you probably have some insight into the writing process for Glory Road. Every sports movie cliche ever, and I mean EVER is shoehorned in. Not content with that, we also get our fill of classic Bruckheimer camera flyby's, and a smattering of hoary hollywood set-pieces. In fact, these cliches come so thick and fast that if one were to play a drinking game set to the tired old chestnuts, even a fratboy would be hard pressed to make it past 30 minutes.

There's the "Big Game", the "My Way or the High Way" speech, the "Kick the kid off the team before he comes back and becomes an important contributor." And of course "Big mama makes sure her boy does his homework". There's even John Voigt, semi-reprising his role as vaguely hitlerian coach from Varsity Blues, this time as legendary (and legendarily racist) Kentucky coach Adolph Rupp.

That being said, I didn't hate the movie. There's not enough of substance to hate, plus the basketball scenes were well done. And perhaps the best part was the interviews with the actual Texas Western players and coaches (as well as Kentucky's Pat Riley) which played over the end credits, along with some archival footage. Which demonstrates that Riley indeed got dunked on to open the game.

Pooh's View: Netflix worthy, but you're crazy if you pay full price. ($9.25 at the theatre I went to...)

Saturday, January 21, 2006

It's Not Personal. It's Business.

Normally, such things are hyperbolic and uniteresting. But this one is hyperbolic and funny. Well done.

Friday, January 20, 2006

Double Feature: A History of Violence & The Aristocrats

I'm something of a movie snob. Not neccesarily in my tastes, but in the whole movie "experience". I like going to the theatre, sinking into a chair that I only wish they'd put on an airplane with a vat of bubbly cavity-juice in one hand and a bucket of lightly popcorned salt in the other. (But no butter. My first job was at a movie theatre, and one of the tasks was to clean the butter machine at the end of the night. I think it was made from the same substance as the Water-Monster in The Abyss. So, thankyouno.)

But I've begun to enjoy the "dinner theatre" movie experience. First, it's cheaper. Second "a glass'a'beer". Third, the long lost art of the double feature. Such as the twin bill of A History of Violence and The Aristocrats. A weirder double, I cannot imagine. Maybe consecutive showings of "A Room With a View" and "Natural Born Killers?"

Anyway, AHOV. Meh. The first third of the movie sets a nice tone of menace in a small town, but from there, I think it goes of the rails and into my Charles Smith memorial "Million dollar move, ten cent finish" Hall of Non-Fame for movies which have interesting premises and/or set-ups and then fail to deliver. Other entries include Wolf, From Dusk til Dawn, and taken as a trilogy, The Matrix trilogy. Alternatively, there are the pieces of three different films, none of which go together especially well, though the final third gives you an idea of what it would have been like had Jet Li played Aragorn. And there's a very aggressive sex scene for no real reason.

The being said, The Aristocrats was stupendous. 3 minutes in, I was worried that I wasn't going to be able to drink the aforementioned glass of beer because I was laughing so hard. And this is a movie where arguably the biggest laughs are produced by Bob Saget, (which if you watch Entourage is not a total shock) and Gilbert Gottfried. If you don't know, the premise of the movie is the oral (I use the word advisedly) history of one particular joke. And it's a crap joke, but the humor is in the way the various comedians fill the space between the setup and the punchline. Of course, I must warn that if you are sensitive to profanity, your mileage may most assuredly vary, as Tarantino would be ashamed of the language in the film. The tagline captures the essence pretty well: "No Nudity. No Violence. Unspeakable Obscenity."

Antonio Davis Runs Around the House.

Or so might Sam Cassell sayeth

Jackie Christie, Meet Kendra Davis. Kendra Davis, Jackie Christie. There might be a new Sheriff in CrazyWife Town. I'm just saying. All you need to know is she got in Latrell Sprewell's face during a game. You remember, the guy who choked his coach? (Spree might not my first pick of opponents, size differences aside. Lest we forget, a few years ago he broke is hand in altercation aboard his yacht.)

Thursday, January 19, 2006

Return of The(o) Mack

The Prodigal son has returned:
The most successful general manager in franchise history will rejoin the Red Sox baseball operations department in a full-time -- but otherwise unspecified -- position. His long-rumored return comes 2½ months after he fled Fenway Park in a gorilla suit.

"As you know, we have spoken frequently during the last 10 weeks," the team and Epstein said in a joint statement on Thursday night. "We have engaged in healthy, spirited debates about what it will take over the long term for the Red Sox to remain a great organization and, in fact, become a more effective organization in philosophy, approaches and ideals.
Perhpaps ironically, the Ford commercial set to "Return of the Mack" was playing on TV when I first saw this item, and that song and "Hey-Yah", about sum up my reaction.

Now, Theo, get us a CF and a SS.

David Stern's Sticky Wicket

By now, you've all seen Antonio Davis hopping into the stands during last night's game because some yahoo was messing with his wife, (who according to reports, is not entirely blameless, but that is neither here nor there.) The question in this post-Palace Brawl league, what now? I'm on the record as saying that I thought Artest getting dinged for the season was excessive (though not as excessive as Jermaine O'Neal's suspension - if you come on the court, and get decked, tough cookies, I say. Remember the Gamboa's, father and son?) But with that precedent, was does DS do here? ESPN set's the morning line at 8 games. I think that is excessive. What do you think?

Update: 5 Games. I can live with that, though maybe a touch excessive. Scoop Jackson, in an otherwise not especially cogent column makes the point that without the Melee in the Motor City, this is a non-issue. Well, that could be true, it might not be. But it is certainly counterfactual - this is a new world. For an example of how an athlete should handle the situation, look to Gary Sheffield (how does BalcoBoy #3 become the poster child for restraint, BTW?). Alternatively, look to the security arrangements in Fenway, and whatever they were doing that neither the United Center nor the Palace seemed capable of.

Mana From PR Heaven: Schiavo Redux?

With the stories of the day concerning wiretapping, corruption, Medicare Part D and suing google for search results (more on the last later), what would be best for, erm, certain people, (OK, Hillary and Ray Nagin might be ok with the timing as well) if it became a cause celebre?
Last fall, Haleigh was hospitalized after her stepfather allegedly burned her and beat her nearly to death with a baseball bat. Haleigh, in a coma, was kept alive by a feeding tube and ventilator. Doctors said she was “virtually brain dead”—in a persistent vegetative state with no hope of recovery.

The Massachusetts Department of Social Services wanted to remove Haleigh’s feeding and breathing tubes.


***

The only person who wanted Haleigh alive was her stepfather, who will likely be charged with murder if Haleigh dies.
Of course, this means she should be kept alive. By an act of Congress if neccesary. Compare, if you will, the case which caused me to initiate the AHW Awards, that of Tirhas Habtegiris:
Tirhas Habtegiris, a 27-year-old terminal cancer patient at Baylor Regional Medical Center in Plano, Texas, was removed from her ventilator last month because she couldn't pay her medical bills. The hospital gave Ms. Habtegiris' family 10 days' notice, and then, with the bills still unpaid, withdrew her life support on the 11th day. It took Ms. Habtegiris about 15 minutes to die.
It's not like you could have called it beforehand, could you?

Update: Upon further reflection, this sums up my thoughts pretty nicely:
I’d strangle her myself if it would get everybody aside from her mother to shut the fuck up about it.
Considering that the poor girl might be improving that seems wise (except for the strangling part. That was meant as hyperbole. I think. You can never be sure these days.) But why in the Halls of Valhalla should Stepdaddy McConvict have any say in the matter?

Wednesday, January 18, 2006

Asshole of the Week: Taking a Bat to the Golden Goose

Via Joe, amongst others, I find that Major League Baseball, using its own inimintable brand of logic, is at it again:
After long ignoring the fantasy movement, Major League Baseball entered the business in 2001. Last year, baseball ordered game operators to obtain a license before plugging player statistics into software that runs their games. Now, a Missouri company, CBC Distribution & Marketing, has responded by suing baseball in U.S. District Court in St. Louis, alleging that it had no right to demand that operators be licensed.
In the modern cable world, what are the two things which drive interest in athletic leagues the most? Were I to guess, I would say gambling and fantasy sports. Obviously, a league can't cozy up to gambling interests, (though I would suggest that anyone who gambles on baseball is either Pete Rose or out of their mind, or both, given the high degree of day-to-day randomness involved in baseball results. There are two parameters which define a systematic approach to gambling: expectation and variance. It's hard enough to beat the oddsmakers in terms of expectation. Increasing the variance through increased randomness of individual outcome makes the likelihood of going broke that much higher. Not that I know anything about gambling for money...but I digress)

So that leaves fantasy sports. Naturally, MLB has decided to discourage fantasy sports by charging a licensing fee. Yes, they are taxing their fans. As if Personal Seating Licenses, municipal stadium initiatives and 8 DOLLAR BUD LIGHTS are not enough. Not only is this greedy, it's stupid, and it will be darn right impossible to enforce. It's almost as if baseball is trying to lose its 'exemption' from the antitrust laws. Of course if drive of all of your customers, the Sherman Act is the least of your worries.

Never ones to be left behind, the Player's Association has jumped in as well:
[T]he Players’ Association has intervened as a defendant and is asserting counterclaims against CBC for breach of contract, and is asserting defenses against declaratory judgment based on terms of the previous license. The Players’ Association has moved for summary judgment.
Because my roto team should be another marketing opportunity for Barry Bonds Brand "Flackseed Oil (so far as you know) Supplement". Seriously, will people who don't live in (or support teams from) NYC, Boston, LAofAnaheim, Chicago or Atlanta even care about baseball if they can't play free fantasy sports? The SlatRat certainly wouldn't if she had to pay much for her beloved (and bedraggled) Wool Sox. (Closed circuit to Steph: this site might be a good place for scouting info on the Wool Sox "morals clause." Let's just say that they have the best clubhouse in all of fantasy sports...)

Daniel Drezner has more...

An offer I Can't Refuse

Ok, I know that stuff like this is pretty much costless, but what's the point?
hi sethypooh21
I saw your pic on line and you are hot
add me to msn messenger my is hottielikesguys

and lets have fun there



Wqb Knbq Mwv Vtd Fytmhiupd
Efj Llflxsm
Olga Janice
VrfcybXpnqprkOluupxiym
Olive Jasmine
RkwyLnnrVrwpt
Baipf
Olympia Jazlyn
Oxgni
Xaqlrve

Opal Jazzy
Has anyone, ever answered that? In any way? Or am I receiving some sort of code?

Update 1/20: And this is why you don't blog angry, not that there's anything wrong with that.

New Years Resolution Book #1: Assasins' Gate



So, I knew from the start that endeavoring to read 50 books in 52 weeks was asking a lot of myself, considering the pressures of work, beer, TV, beer, movies, beer and XBox (still vanilla, no 360 yet...) I don't think I helped my cause by taking such a large bite first. The Assassin's Gate is an unflinching look into the second Iraq war, starting with an overview of the underpinnings of the neoconservative ideology espoused by Wolfowitcz and Feith, continuing with the actual war planning (and, of course the absence of post war planning) moving on to the insurgency, and the effects felt here in the U.S.

The meat of the book deals with the situation on the ground, from the perspetive of both Iraqis of all stripes (Sunni and Shiite; Arab and Kurd) and classes, as well as Americans civilian and military. Chapter after chapter illustrates how truly ill-prepared we were to do any sort of reconstruction.

Packer's early ambivalence towards the invasion, and later disgust at the occupation are clear, but rarely overpowering. It's hard to really identify a hero of the piece - one of Packer's earliest and more sympathetic subjects is Iraqi expat author Kanan Makiya, yet his idealism carries much of the blame for the postwar incompetence: It was he who told Bush that U.S. soldiers would be greeted "with sweets and flowers." There are villains aplenty, however, from radical Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr (portrayed as a brutal and opportunistic fraud), to Paul Bremer, to of course Donald Rumsfeld.

Ultimately, Packer lays much of the blame at the feet of the Adminsitration. In the epilogue, he sums up much of what came before:
Swaddled in abstract ideas, convinced of their own righteousness, incapable of self-criticism, indifferent to accountability, they turned a difficult undertaking into a needlessly deadly one. When things went wrong, they found other people to blame. The Iraq war was always winnable; it still is. For this very reason, the recklessness of its authors is all the harder to forgive.
Pooh sez: Read it all. Be prepared to be made angry.

Next up: Lies, Damn Lies and Red Sox ("Mind Game" by the people who run Baseball Prospectus.)

Tuesday, January 17, 2006

Make a Movie List? Twist My Arm...

Rob at LGM passes along an intersting conceit for a movie list:
You have to explain America to someone from not here, but you can only use ten movies to do it. Which ten do you choose?

The idea is not to give them a history lesson, so you don't have to start with The New World and end with Jarhead.

What you're trying to do is give them a sense of who we are---your take on our dreams, our attitudes, our idioms, what we think we are, what we are afraid we are, what we really might be.
In no particular order

1. Contact - the tension between Science and Faith is one of the defining features of America, hasn't it always been thus?

2. Office Space/Fight Club - different takes on a similar theme: the anonymity and dehumanising aspects of being a worker bee in McWorld.

3. ...And Justice For All - It's a farce. It's the legal system. It's a farce about our legal system. But it has a lot to say about the conflict between those with 'an in' and those without.

4. Dirty Harry - now that 'the West' is gone, this is the iconic portrayal of the American Badass. We still have a whole lot of "make my day" in our character, don't we?

5. Reality Bites - "Define Irony". Depressed, under employed, over educated, bitter twentysomethings. Sounds like a few people I know.

6. The Big Chill - What happened to our youth/life/dreams?

7. Miracle/Hoosiers - American Character triumphs over adversity, pulling victory from the jaws of defeat.

8. 8 Mile/Walk the Line/Ray/[Insert biopic] - Rags to riches.

9. Do the Right Thing - Still the best movie about race in America.

10. Wall Street - Greed is good. Greed is right. Greed works.

Our Long National Nightmare is Over

ESPN just reported that Slappy McPatriotic has decided to play for the U.S., not his 'native' Dominican Republic. In the upcomng World Baseball Classic. (He was born in NYC.) I'll sleep better tonight knowing who will hit 4 homeruns vs. Italy, but leave the bases loaded twice and commit 3 errors vs. Cuba, should they be allowed to play.

"I'm gonna tell ya ... if I see this guy Bill Simmons, oh, it's gonna be a problem with me and him ..."

Isaiah Thomas, Worst. General. Manager. Ever. calls out the Sports Guy. Read the whole thing. Do it now. And then cast your vote as to Quien es Mas Macho. A few of the comments on the poll link are priceless:
Isaiah thomas wins obviously but i think the following poll questions could be better:

who do New Yorkers back up in the fight?

Bill Simmons or Thomas (Simmons)

who do knick players back up in the fight?

Bill Simmons or Thomas (Simmons)

you get where i am going with this? in fact i think the only people who help thomas are other NBA GMs because Thomas always make them the 2nd, 3rd, 4th worst GM in the NBA or allow them to say "well at least i didn't do what Thomas did i n NY"

Somebody get the popcorn...


Update 1/18: Isaiah wins, by a surprisingly slim 54-46 margin. By the transitive property of macho, Mark Cuban could kick Zeke's ass. [CheapShot]But at least Simmons is outpolling the Prez.[/CheapShot]

Monday, January 16, 2006

An Uplifting Link

Audio files of many of MLK's speeches can be found here. Additional fies available here.

Steven Jobs, WTF?

My latest newsletter from The Electronic Freedom Foundation ("This newsletter is printed on 100% recycled electrons. " Chuckles.) contains two interesting items. The first involves the normally customer-conscious Apple getting one badly wrong:
This week at MacWorld, Apple unveiled version 6.0.2 of iTunes, which it simply claimed "includes stability and performance improvements over iTunes 6.0.1." Among these so- called improvements is the Apple iTunes MiniStore—a localized "recommendation" engine that would look at what you listen to and then suggest additional songs and artists you might like. The MiniStore arrives turned on by default without asking a user's permission first.

However, as news reports have revealed this week, it appears that the MiniStore also automatically transmits your listening information over the Internet back to the Apple Mothership.
What Apple does with this information is unknown, although Apple has represented that it is not collecting data on its users—yet. Nor has Apple disclosed the steps it takes to prevent disclosure or leakage of the information to third parties.

Ironically, this news comes on the heels of the recent Sony BMG DRM fiasco, a part of which included an undisclosed "phone home" feature of its own. While the Apple MiniStore isn't a rootkit DRM, it is part of a dangerous trend EFF has been witnessing in the digital music space market. When companies like Apple and Sony BMG start adjusting or installing software to micro-monitor our personal and private actions, even under the rubric of convenience, it is just one short stop down the road toward attempting to condition and control our behavior. All it takes is an enforcement protocol to turn recommendations into restrictions overnight.

If companies like Apple are truly about user empowerment, they must watch this trend closely and remain on the right side of it. Allowing users to upload information voluntarily and expressly with adequate privacy protections is pro-user; surreptitiously siphoning it into a remote database without any privacy guarantees is not. It's time for Apple to pick a side of the line and walk it.

Note: You can turn off the Apple MiniStore by hitting Shift- Command-M, or choose Edit: Hide MiniStore. EFF recommends that iTunes users do so until Apple at least comes clean about its MiniStore data practices.
(Emphasis mine.) As the article notes, they should know better. A recomendation engine is a sweet idea, but this seems overly intrustive, especially considering the opacity involved with the process. I'm less concerned than EFF about the 1984ish aspects of this, (nerd joke alert) but simple concern for unwanted, unneeded and unacknowledged collection of
private information is raised.

In contrast, we get news of record companies learning to roll with distribution models which taken advantage of technological innovation, rather than attempting to stifle it:
There's a new trend underway among indie labels, dubbed "digital vinyl": offering free MP3 downloads for customers who buy albums on vinyl. First Merge Records offered free downloads to those who bought vinyl releases by Clientele and Robert Pollard. Now Saddle Creek Records has announced that it will do the same thing for its customers who prefer vinyl, starting with What the Toll Tells, the new record by Two Gallants due in February.

For a variety of reasons, vinyl has enjoyed a resurgence of popularity among music fans. Unfortunately, music fans who own turntables and iPods find themselves in a bit of a quandry.

Who cares, you say? How many people could that be, you say? Well, smart independent labels aren't asking those questions. Instead, they are trying to make their customers happy, even the vinyl-loving, iPod-equipped ones.

Quite a stark contrast to the likes of EMI and Sony BMG, whose copy-protected CDs are stopping music fans from getting their CDs into their iPods.
Now I'm not a vinylphile myself, but this is an obvious example of responding to customer desires rather than attempting to dictate adherence to an outdated distribution model.

Vince Young Will Suck in the NFL.

There, I said it. All you recent bandwagon jumpers out there take note.

As for people wondering why nobody in the NFL runs the option, coming soon to a stadium near you, Vince Young gets Blowed Up (and yes, I'm dumping the stock too...) Seriously, when the guy trying to tackle you is Matt Leinart's Wingman/Roommate, that's a slightly different beast then an Ed Reed or a Brian Urlacher. Remember, MLWRs made the offenses of Fresno State and Our Lady of Insufferable Alumni look like that of the ColtsSeahawks.

Consider, as frequent commenter Icepick has some good reasons to be skeptical about Vinsanity as an NFL signal-caller:
VY was also the most dominant physical presence on the field when his team had the ball. There wasn't even anyone close to his level. But what happens when he is up against a fair NFL defense? ALL of the athletes he will be facing will be tougher than almost anyone he would play against in college. And when he facing a team like the Bucs or the Bears? There will be several athletes on the defensive side of the ball almost as good as he is, if not better, from an athletic point of view. Will he be able to keep his poise in when he ISN'T far and away the best athlete on the field?

A lot of the QBs that go at the very top of the draft have dominated in college because of their superior athletic ability. But take a guy like Brady, who was a good QB at a good school. Brady probably wasn't the best athlete on his own team . . . So he never had the luxury of being able to take over a game solely by his athletic ability. He had to make correct decisions under fire when he wasn't the best guy out there.

And that, of course, is what playing QB in the NFL is all about. Even a lot of the great QBs in the NFL haven't been domina[nt] athletic presences.

. . .

All of these QBs had physical gifts that most of us can't imagine, but none of those guys would have been in the NFL if they weren't QBs. Those guys weren't going the Matt Jones route. But all of them were superior decision makers, especially under duress.

Even the extremely talented QBs who are great (think Elway as the best example), were great decision makers under fire. And those incredibly athletic QBs who had great athletic ability but not great decision making ability (think R. Cunningham, who was good but not great) just weren't contenders for Canton.


Consider, who are the recent QB's VY is most like? I'd probably start with Tommy Frazier or Michael Bishop. Maybe Eric Crouch. Except that the only one of those guys to even get a cup of coffee in the League (as a QB), Bishop, had an absolute canon for an arm, not the rubber-band/slingshot attached to Vince. Mike Vick you ask? Well first of all, if we are making a list of the most-overrated players in major sports, isn't Vick at or near the top of any list? Second, see above comment about arm-strength.

What are some of the other comaprisons? Kordell Stewart? (SLASH!) In the interest of not stereotyping based on race, Steve Young? Well, it may just be an issue of maturity and polish, but Steve Young certainly seems like a much smarter guy. (By way of comparison, McNabb had similar poise.) How many succesful NFL quarterbacks are not somewhat articulate when interviewed? Further, Steve played for several years on horrible Bucs teams without getting benched - how many years will Vince have before he is either broken (see Vick or Archie Manning) or declared a bust? And then Steve won the lottery and landed on the last of the Pre-Cap NFL dynasties - a great O-Line, Roger Craig/Ricky Watters and Tom Rathman in the backfield. Rice, John Taylor and a pre-attitude T.O. at receiver. A genius coach. Will Vince have any of those pieces at any point during his career?

Perhaps the best comparison is the one 'Pick ended with - Randall Cunningham, right down to the glacial throwing motion. (Who was the last succesful side-arm quarterback? No, David Carr does not count). Except for one magical season with the Vikes, Cunningham's performances could best be described by the British expression "flattering to deceive".

Now, Vince Young is not the "next Randall Cunningham," he's the first Vince Young. Given my recent probnosticating travails, I may have annointed him the next great one. (BTW, my one prediction from this past weekend? "Joey Porter is an idiot. 45-10 Colts.". Well, I'll take a 1 of 2 on that one...)

But there is a reason Reggie Bush was consisered the best player all season - he was the best player all season. Many people have one great game (Ryan Fitzpatrick, anyone?) and people lose their minds.

Sunday, January 15, 2006

Whither Today's MLK

Tommorow being MLK's birthday, thought I'd pass along an interesting article discussing how the implied moral authority of religious figures has diminished since his day:
[King] was a huge, complex figure, . . . but, put simply: King used his moral authority as a minister to shame many mainstream Americans into changing their fundamental beliefs and practices. Put even more simply, nobody could do that now: ministers no longer have moral authority, and lack a mainstream political role.
I'm not sure I agree with the statement that "ministers no longer have moral authority." One of my college roomates is now a minister, and he has as much "moral authority" as anyone I know. However, I would submit that his authority comes not from his role as a minister, but rather his choice to become (and be accepted as) a minister stems from his strength of character.

The being said, I think the larger point holds in that the public face of religion in America is too often Ralph Reed, or Pat Robertson, or Creflo Dollar. Back to King:
He rarely claimed that God gave him authority to make public policy on racial matters. He preached to his congregations, but mostly he used his social authority as a minister to make secular arguments on racial matters. If it's hard to imagine what this could have looked like, consider how we treat former generals talking about Iraq. A general's claim can certainly be wrong, and of course generals disagree, but a general has both presumptive authority on military matters and presumptive moral status as someone who has a certain character. Well, ministers used to be looked at the same way: Americans took both their moral opinions and their character seriously, though both were subject to rebuttal. King's preacherly mien increased rather than decreased his general authority on moral matters.

We don't respect clergy like that anymore. As "mainline" denominations have weakened, and polarized politically, and free-lance evangelicals gained strength, a public statement by a preacher has come to convince those of the same religion and politics--but not the rest of society. (Polls on whether people want clergy to "speak up on political and social questions" often obscure this: if every voter wants her own religious authority to speak up on her own side, and would consider changing religious affiliations for political reasons, this means that clergy lack social power.)
I think the bolded quote probably tells a good deal of the story as to why ministers have lost some mainstream clout. Read the whole thing.

(Lest you assume that I don't think religious figures can be forces for good, I would point to the aspirations of those slightly humbler than the 'leaders' I named above. See here and here for examples.)

David Stern, NFL, Redux

Oh. My. Goodness.

Is Peyton Manning going to start Hulking-up on the sideline? I half expect someone to come from the sideline and crunch Bettis with a metal chair.

Update: Justice prevails. Shannon Sharpe just called out the horrible officiating. Will the NFL fine him a game check?

Update 2: Poor John at Balloon Juice. Die hard Steelers fan that he is, the game was a little rough on him:

Go Black and Gold!

*** Update ***

Halftime, Steelers leading 14-3. About as good as I could have hoped for.

*** Update ***

If the refs ove8rturn this interception by Polamolu, they are actively trying to give the game to the Colts.

*** Update ***I

between the pass interference call, the non-call on the offsides, and that bs int, the game is fixed.

*** Update ***

I can’t even watch the last four mintues, because this game is fixed and I am going to have a heart attack. Non-call on the blatant PI on Randel El, the non-call when the entire Colts was offside, and overturnjing that INT. Total Bullshit.

*** Update ***

We fight the refs and win, and the blow it on the 2 yard line. I fucking quit.

*** Update ***

Any questions I may have had about the health of my heart have been answered. If I lived through that, I am fine. My God. I need a drink.


Update 3: Schadenfreude

Saturday, January 14, 2006

"Still confused, but often witty"

XWL pegs me just about right. Of course on many subjects, he confuses "correct" with "confused", but we'll let that little gaffe slide. Others have different thoughts on the subject of Pooh:

"Coming from a halfwit like you, I'll take that as a compliment" - commenter Darrell from Balloon Juice.

"Nakedly partisan and activist" - 'Professor' Ann Altmouse.

"Raving Moonbat" - Darrell. Again.

"A neurotic Alaskan" - Jake

"Lying Asshole" - Darrell. Who doesn't seem to like me at all.

"Disabler" - Everyone I know in real life.


Openish comments for anyone who wants to pile on...

David Stern Moves to the NFL.

Worst. Call. Ever. The ball was only overthrown by 10 yards. Why is the NFL so un-Patriot-ic?

I Think I'm Doing this Wrong

So, I went to a Beer Festival last night. And there were some wonderful offerings there. Unfortunately, I can't remember a one of them...In other news, I'm not as young as I used to be, nor is my liver.

Thursday, January 12, 2006

Just to Get it Off My Chest

Boo-Fucking-Hoo. Carry on.

All I Have to Say About Alito

I'm glad I've had to work and so have not had the temptation to watch the confirmation hearings. All the Senators are giant windbags, and the Judge has been well coached to not be a Borkian asshole to Specter. Hence, snooze. Until we get some BS about how mean Ted Kennedy was to make the Judge's wife cry. Except that Lindsay Graham made her cry, but here in the all-spin zone, who needs facts when you have truthiness?

Personally, I think the CAP thing is probably no big deal. Or at least it shouldn't be. Hell, I joined the Century Club in college, and I don't remember a damn thing about it. (Of course I wouldn't put it on a job application either. Well, I suppose it depends on the job.) But this Reaganesque "I can't recall" line of answers sure makes it look like he's hiding something, so it's worth a follow-up. Considering that this issue has been out there for 3 months, you'd think Alito would have 'refreshed' his memory. (Or, if I'm being completely cynical, his handlers told him to be evasive, knew Teddy-boy would go all bull-in-a-china-shop on it, and then Graham could make Mrs. Alito cry = political gold.

Why are they so mean? Because the guy is about to be appointed for life, so I think it makes sense to, you know, ask tough, perhaps unpleasant questions up front. Or we can just "trust" the guy who told us that Harriet Miers was the bestest jurist ever - nobody ever ran a state lottery like that gal. (And since lotteries act as a tax on dumb poor people, of course she was a fave...)

A interesting question is why the Dems went with all these half-wits instead of someone who is capable of asking good questions. Who might that guy be? Barack Obama of course:
can you imagine how much Democrats would benefit from having Barack Obama--a Harvard Law School graduate, remember--in that chair instead? Especially when the topic turns to the Concerned Alumni of Princeton. (It wouldn't hurt Obama's national ambitions at all, either.) It's like leaving your Rookie of the Year player on the bench for the World Series. Another missed opportunity for Democrats.


Finally, for anyone interested in what was actually said, save some time and check out Bill's Shorter Senator and Sammy posts.

Update: This nonsense about Alito's wife being reduced to tears is ludicrous, as I commented elsewhere today:
I don't think I've ever been more disappointed by the lack of sense possessed by the American public than from this inane concern about whether this woman cried. First of all, CAP is an issue. It should have been a small one, but a non-denial denial makes it look like he's hiding something when I'm 99.9% sure he isn't. Second, did his family expect the Senators to roll over and ask for a belly-rub? Third, how the hell is her crying relevant to anything in the known universe? Does it have any bearing on Alito's fitness for the bench?

But since we live in a culture where asking hard questions is "partisanship" I guess this is the worst thing that's happened since Janet Jackson's wardrobe malfunction.

Update #2: For absolutely final thoughts on the matter, see here.

Wednesday, January 11, 2006

Does Microsoft Knows Too Much About Me?

With all the worries about our privacy these days, Micorsoft's search engine is of the opinion that I've gone over the edge. Point taken.

Asshole of the Week: Warm Suds Edition

Mmmm. Warm Beer. So says a Missouri state senator:
Under a bill by Sen. Bill Alter, grocery and convenience stores would risk losing their liquor licenses if they sold beer colder than 60 degrees. The intent is to cut down on drunken driving by making it less tempting to pop open a beer after leaving the store.
Well shit, why stop there? Force bars to serve it warm too. That way no one will ever drink. Just like prohibition. And as we know, Prohibition = Vegas. So that can't be bad...
"The only reason why beer would need to be cold is so that it can be consumed right away," Alter, who has been a police offer for more than 20 years, said Thursday.
Take away the "right away" and I agree completely with the above statement.

But the worst part is how he came up with the idea:
He said the idea came from a fifth-grade student in Jefferson County who was participating in a program to teach elementary students about state government. He sought their suggestions for new laws and chose the cold beer ban from a list of the top three ideas.
I could insert a joke about being governed by fifth graders, but after listening to Kennedy and Cormyn at the Alito confirmations, it hits a little to close to home.

Bonus recognition to the AP reporter who couldn't resist:
Some lawmakers and lobbyists, however, are lukewarm about the idea.
Somewhere, my dad is nodding his approval at that one.

Tuesday, January 10, 2006

Badass Vic Mackey

Yup, Season Five of The Shield starts in about 10 minutes. I am so fired up. I don't think I've blogged about what I like about this show, but I suppose I'll get to it at some point. Anyway, Forrest Whitaker as Vic's adversary this season has me, to risk understatement, intrigued. Too bad Glenn Close is gone, but I'll live. Yes. I know, I watch too much TV, but I have only about 100 pages left in book #1 for the year, so I can justify it.

Tuesday Quickies

  • A little late - For me at least. Educators are waking up (buh-dump) to the fact that starting classes at oh-dark-30 every morning is not the best idea ever. Ezra Klein has further thoughts:
    More to the family values point, the actual impact of such an early beginning is an early end, meaning teens have plenty of time to hang out afterschool while their parents are still at work. The average schoolday, in my experience, is 7:30 to 2:30. But given the rise in dual-worker families, having kids leave campus closer to five would be good for everyone, so why not make it 9:30 to 4:30? Nobody, after all, has the energy to get into trouble before 8am, and after five, as I well remember, it gets much harder.
    Given my morning issues (ok, more generally punctuality issues, but mostly morning...), I'm left to lament "Oh, were it that way back in my day..."

  • George Will wields a sharp knife - his intro to today's piece:
    Before evolution produced creatures of our perfection, there was a three-ton dinosaur, the stegosaurus, so neurologically sluggish that when its tail was injured, significant time elapsed before news of the trauma meandered up its long spine to its walnut-size brain. This primitive beast, not the dignified elephant, should be the symbol of House Republicans.
    Ouch.

  • Papa Pooh was inducted into the Church of The 'Stache last night. And it was good.

  • Wha Happened to Heather Graham? The most entertaining reviews are the bad ones - which might mean that RollerGirl's new show will make for better reading than viewing. Slate does the dirty here:
    What happened to Heather Graham's career? She was so arresting to watch from the moment she skated onscreen as Rollergirl
    . . .
    Ever since Boogie Nights, though, Heather Graham has struggled to find a place on the big or small screen. Eight years later, after appearing in a steady stream of utter dogs (Killing Me Softly, Say It Isn't So) or forgettable mediocrities (From Hell, Sidewalks of New York), she has yet to make a lasting impression in any role. What Graham has been best at is playing a parody of her own sexiness, the unwitting object of knuckle-biting male desire: Felicity Shagwell in the second Austin Powers movie or Dr. Molly Clock, the mouthwatering attending psychiatrist, in a brief guest stint on Scrubs.
  • Ben. Wallace.:



    Yeah.


  • And, let's not forget, tommorow is the unveiling Asshole of the Week. I put myself in consideration, mostly for haunting this website, but I can't. As far as parody blogs go, that one does not equal Harriet Miers' but its close. Other worthy nominees included this ****face and the window opening guy in this story (thanks to Bill for the pointer). Watch this space for the winner.


P.S. - Icepick, I have not forgotten the Vince Young issue. Am working on it.

Happy Happy (Joyously Open)

WAP turns 200...rightnow. That's right, this is the 200th post. That's alot of shite being shovelled in a few short months. I better make this one special...or just hubristicly declare it an open thread for the dozen or so of you out there...

Monday, January 09, 2006

Quasi-Belated New Years Resolution: One Book, One Week...

I know, revolutionairy right? But I think I watch too much TV, so it's probably a good thing. Also, it might cabin my habit of reading 4+ books at once (I have 5 currently open.) I'm actually going for 50 books total, so we'll see how this goes.

Titles
# 1 The Assissins' Gate, by George Packer.
# 2 & #3 'Mind Game' & 'Basketball on Paper'
# 4 'Fargo Rock City' By Chuck Klosterman
# 5 'Futebol: Soccer the Brazillian Way' by Alex Bellos
# 6 'The Sixth Man: A Year in the NBA Playground' by Chris Palmer
# 7 Shanks For Nothing by Rick Reilly
# 8 Killing Yourself to Live by Chuck Klosterman
# 9 The Republican War on Science by Chris Mooney
#10 A Thinking Fans Guide to the World Cup edited by Matt Weiland and Sean Wilsey
#11 Crashing the Gate by Jerome Armstrong and Markos Moulitasis Zuniga
#12 How Would a Patriot Act? by Glenn Greenwald
#13 The Miracle of Castel di Sangro by Joe McGinnis
#14 Fiasco: A History of Hollywood's Iconic Flops by James Robert Parish
#15 Salt: A World History by Mark Kurlansky
#16 Baseball Between the Numbers edited by Jonah Keri (posted at TWT)
#17 On Bullshit by Harry G. Frankfurt
#18 Zero: A Biography of a Dangerous Idea by Charles Seife
#19 The Cold War: A New History by John Lewis Gaddis
#20 Sex, Drugs and Cocoa Puffs by Chuck Klosterman
#21 Killer Instinct by Joseph Finder
#22 Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking by Malcolm Gladwell
#23 The Devil Wears Pinstripes by Jim Caple
#24 The Good Fight by Peter Beinart
#25 Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World by Jack Weatherford
#26 A History of the World in 6 Glasses by Tom Standage
#27 How Soccer Explains the World by Franklin Foer
#28 Brilliant Orange by David Winner
#29 The Mind of Bill James by Scott Gray
#30 Triumph and Tragedy in Mudville by Stephen Jay Gould
#31 FantasyLand by Sam Walker
#32 In the Shadow of the Law by Kermit Roosevelt
#33 Assassination Vacation by Sarah Vowell
#34 What's My Name, Fool? by Dave Zirin
#35 The Tipping Point by Malcolm Gladwell
#36 The Blind Side by Michael Lewis
#37 Hood by Stephen Lawhead
#38 A Feast For Crows by George R.R. Martin
#39 The Conservative Soul by Andrew Sullivan
#40 A History of Warfare by John Keegan
#41 To Hate Like This is To Be Happy Forever by Will Blythe
#42 The Code: The Unwritten Rules of Fighting and Retaliation in the NHL by Ross Bernstein
#43 Homicide by David Simon
#44 The Face of Battle by John Keegan


Other
May Book Pile

Book Pile
Current

The First World War by John Keegan
Taliesen by Stephen Lawhead
40 Million Dollar Slaves by William Rhoden
Blue Blood by Edward Conlon
The Physics of Superheroes by James Kakalios
The Great Risk Shift by Jacob Hacker
The Winner's Curse

Open To Some Extent
Soccer in Sun and Shadows by Eduardo Galeano
A History of God by Karen Armstrong
The Breaks of the Game by David Halberstam
The Daemon-Haunted World by Carl Sagan
The Road to Surfdom by F.A. Hayek
The Constitution of Libery by F.A. Hayek

Waiting
The Sling and the Stone by Thomas X. Hammes
Ball Four by Jim Bouton
Doc Holliday
Boffo!
Cobra II
The One Percent Doctrine by Ron Sunskind
The Left Hand of God by Michael Lerner
A Death in Belmont by Sebastian Junger
Billions and Billions by Carl Sagan
The Art of War by Sun Tzu
The Best Interests of Baseball by Andrew Zimbalist
The Sound and the Fury by Dave Kindred
Club Life
A Conflict of Visions by Thomas Sowell
Wealth and Democracy by Kevin Phillips
American Theocracy by Kevin Phillips
Anonymous Lawyer by Jeremy Blachman
Please Kill Me: The Oral History of Punk

Sunday, January 08, 2006

An Interesting Idea

XWL has another interesting idea for reforming American Politics - make it more like British Politics:
Here's my modest proposal, every candidate exceeding .51% of the vote shall become a member of Congress. The votes for each district will be divided into a hundred votes to be distributed amongst all the qualifying candidates. All the people who have a vote will serve in Congress. In that manner every district will have a Democratic and a Republican representative, and most likely a Green and Libertarian representative as well. The multiplicity of voices and viewpoints will add to the cacophany admittedly, but also it will create a greater competition in the marketplace of ideas that has sorely been lacking in Congress. Many rules would have to change. With each district potentially being represented by half a dozen or more people, the ability of lobbyist to lobby all these diverse characters and perspectives will be diminished. At the same time each district's constituency will be better represented. No vote would be 'wasted' in this system. Committee chairs would go by a rotating lottery rather than by majority party. Each representative would get the number of lottery entries as they have votes, and each committee would be open to entry by all members without regards to party.

. . .

A look at a state's 2004 results might be instructive as to how this would look.

Let's take a look at Nebraska. The first district would have their votes divided thusly, 54 votes for the GOP, 43 votes for the DEM and 3 votes for the Green. The second district would have 61 votes for the GOP, 36 votes for the DEM, 1 vote for the Green and 2 votes for the Libertarian, and finally in the third district 87 votes for the GOP, 11 votes for the DEM, 1 vote for the Green, and 1 vote for the Nebraska party.

Instead of 3 Republicans, the Nebraska contingent in Congress would have been 3 Republicans with 202 of 300 votes, 3 Democrats with 90 votes, 3 Greens with 5 votes, 1 Libertarian with 2 votes, and one member of the Nebraska party with 1 vote. 11 Representatives instead of just 3. Plus on local issues, many times they could get together and do right by Nebraska while still disagreeing on national or ideological issues.
Hrm. I'll have to think about this one, but it's certainly worthy of thought. As 'they' say, read the whole thing.

It's a Sign

So, I got talked into seeing Brokeback Mountain today. I know, I know, I said I had no desire to see it, and that's true. But sometimes, events intervene. In any event, I was savedthwarted by my generally tenuous relationship with punctuality - the show was sold out by the time I got to the theatre. (Gay cowboys are big in the 'Burg. Who knew?) Perhaps this means me and the film were not meant to be together. C'est la vie.

Anyway, this wasn't the worst thing ever, as I was in mid-TiVo of Duke-Wake Forrest, so I watched that instead. At first, it looked like it was going to follow my blueprint for a Duke loss, Sheldon picked up two quick ones ("A Sheldon can do your income taxes, if you need a root canal, Sheldon's your man... but humpin' and pumpin' is not Sheldon's strong suit."), J.J. wasn't doing much, Erik Williams was being a beast. (He looks tough BTW. He may have dropped about 15 LBS since last year. Very quick, very strong, lots of energy. Mid first-rounder.)




But then JJ went into his "Because I'm JJ Redick" routine. Which many will recognize from Vince Young's Rose Bowl performance (more on that later). I'm still unsure as to his NBA prospects, but if he can guard anybody, he might have a shot at being decent. Has there ever been a three more guaranteed then the one he hit after the Wake guy missed the dunk that could have made it a one point game? Seriously, those "5-pt swing" shots are higher percentage than the Baseline-Fallaway-Out-of-Bounds-Spot in DoubleDribble.

And I have a confession to make. I'm beginning to enjoy Greg Paulus. (He has good vision, and is more athletic than he looks. Even made a 3.) Maybe I should have gone to see Brokeback Mountain after all...

A Highlight I Can't Wait to See.

Vince Carter, let this be a lesson to you:
[Morris] Peterson got a technical for arguing a no-call late in the first half. About a minute later, Carter playfully slapped his ex-teammate in the face. An annoyed Peterson then slapped Carter.
(via DeadSpin)


Update: Saw the highlight. Almost as disappointing as the Giants effort yesterday. A little backhand flap? Get your money's worth at least Mo. And to add insult to non-injury, VC drains trey to win it. No heart? He's all heart MFer...

Doth I Protest Too Much?

So the S-Rat calls me out and says that I am geekier than she is, per this test. And she's RIGHT. I am 29.78304% Total Geek. Meanwhile, Steph, whose job is best described as "Professional Uber-Geek" scores 22%, or merely "A Geek". Oh well, damn the photon torpedos, full speed ahead.

UPDATE 1/10: In the comments, RIA admits to out geeking me. I am saved!

Saturday, January 07, 2006

Of Minor Embarassment

Which Fantasy/SciFi Character Are You?

A brilliant learner with a knack for almost everything, you choose to spend your efforts in the pursuit of travels that extend your own potential.

"Maybe I am sick of following rules and regulations!"


Well, the description makes it a little better. It could be worse, I could be Jar-Jar Binks or Fluffy the Ewok...

(H/T: RIA)

Friday, January 06, 2006

Self-Requited Narcicism.

Undoubtedly, blogging is an intensely ego driven activity. I mean, why the hell should anyone care what I have to say right? (Aside from my omniscience and infallible judgment, of course). Plus there are all these goodies, you got your sitemeter, you got your TTLB Ecosystem (Flippery Fish! [cheap shot] Damnit, it only I had Designed this site more Intelligently, I'd be more highly evolved...[/cheap shot]) so that you can engage in silent competition with your fellow keyboard jockeys. But I think most people keep some degree of perspective as to their own importance. Sometimes, however, we lose said perspective. One of my favorite bloggers seems to have done just that:
I say to the guy who's here right now taking a picture of me blogging for the local newspaper. He set up some lights, he said, to make the photograph interesting with the lighting because, "just a gal sitting at a computer isn't very interesting."
This is the blogging equivalent of the yahoo behind home plate who spends all game on his cell phone. "Hey guys, you see me? I'm on TV! I'M FAMOUS!"

Ms. Althouse, in the words of the Poetic/Actor/Role-Model Ice Cube, "Check yo self before you wreck yo self."


SawxBlogging

J.T. Snow 1 year. $2mil. Is he going to play CF or SS? Meh. (though potentially a decent platoon at 1B with Snow and Greek God of Walks.)

And Manny thinks he's staying put. Good. If we can just pick up a non-replacement level CF (Jeremy Reed?), I think I can live with a no-hit SS, since its not like we will struggle to score runs with the meat of the order being Papi-Manny-Tek-Lowell.

Thursday, January 05, 2006

Teh Funny

How many blondes can dance on the head of a meme?

AHW Revisions - Maybe I'll Rename it the P-Rob

So, it's taken less than a day to realise that I need to make some ground-rules for the Asshole of the Week award. Hopefully, I made it clear yesterday that it's not just another "Wingnut of the Week" or what not - it will not be based on ideological grounds. Secondly, certain people are ineligible. Bill O'Reilly. Michael Moore. Ann Coulter. DNC-era Howie Dean (wha happened Howie? Seriously?). And of course, Pat Robertson:
The Rev. Pat Robertson said Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon is being punished by God for dividing the Land of Israel. Robertson, speaking on the “700 Club” on Thursday, suggested Sharon, who is currently in an induced coma, and former Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, assassinated by an Israeli extremist in 1995, were being treated with enmity by God for dividing Israel. “He was dividing God’s land,” Robertson said. “And I would say, Woe unto any prime minister of Israel who takes a similar course to appease the E.U., the United Nations or the United States of America. God says*, This land belongs to me. You better leave it alone.”
See, the above five (and many more) aren't letting loose their inner jackass, they're just being themselves. Therefore, not eligible.


* God also says "Don't mess with Texas":
Me: Were you really supporting Texas last night?
God: I was.
Me: You seem like more of a USC fan.
God: Interesting comparison, and probably true.
Me: I mean, the burnt orange just doesn't say God to me.
God: What is that?
Me: The University of Texas' school color.
God: Do you like your school?
Me: I'm going to ignore that.
God: Would you recommend this action to a friend?
Me: Ignoring God? Probably not.
God: Do you still ? Why the uncertain tone?
Me: You're very wrathful.
God: You think I am wrathful.
Me: At least, you were in the old testament.
God: I was?
iGod and college football. Good times.

For Those of You Who Don't Know

Frequent commenter 'Mortnut' is, in fact, my father. Please treat him with the inappropriate level of disrespect.

Wednesday, January 04, 2006

I Get One Right.

No, not this one. This one. I told you Texas was more likely to win the championship than Duke. No, I wasn't talking about basketball then, whatever gave you that idea? For those of you scoring at home (or, Keith Olberman, even for those of you by yourself), in the past few months, I have picked the Red Sox over the White Sox, the Astros over the White Sox, Texas hoops to do better than Duke, and now USC as nattie champs. Let me boldly go out on a limb and say the MFY's will win it all in '06 with Canon-Arm Damon hitting .403 with 34 HRs this year.

As to the game - Pete Carroll, What. The. Hell? Did USC not practice tackling once in the last month? What the hell with the swing pass to some yutz (not the Pres, not LenDale, not Jarrett) on 2nd and 7, up 5 with :50 to go. Hand the ball off. And say what you will about C-Webb, but you can at least fathom why he would call time out. I can think of no rational explanation (other than Simmons being right, he is Coach Fredo) for USC using their last time out before a two-point conversion. And his explanation after the game was to make the Pete Carroll Face and find 3 different ways to say "We were confused, we couldn't get it done." No shit.

I'll be honest, the main reason I was rooting for USC was because Texas football fans are incorrigible. Even a transplant like Fletcher is going to be hooting and hollerin' about this one. About the only two worse groups are Nebraska football fans and especially Kentucky hoops fans.

I went to the Final Four in 1998, UK was playing in the second semi. Two Wildcat sweetguys were sitting in the seats directly in front of me - they were drunk and passed out until 5 minutes into the Kentucky game before they woke up and chanted "S-A-T!" at Stanford for the whole game. Then, during the championship game against Utah, the whole game all they could think of (aside from "Pass the binoculars so I can ogle Ashley Judd") was yelling "Hey! Doli-ass!" at Michael Doleac. Chumps...

UPDATE: Sports Guy's Rose Bowl Diary is outstanding. A few quick samples:
8:30 -- Fouts compares Bush to Barry Sanders AND Walter Payton on the same exciting 10-yard run. And you know what? It worked. I was thinking the same thing. I watched a record (for me) 10 college football games this year, including seven USC games, and only because of Reggie Bush. He's so close to Gale Sayers in so many ways, I would almost be afraid to be a white fullback on his NFL team next year.
or
9:17 -- Texas rolls down the field and settles for a 46-yard field goal. 7-3, USC. Hey, after the game, do you think Vince Young will give Johnny Damon his throwing arm back?
You had to know that one will get me.

Update #2 - Law 'Humor' Edition: Heh - "I predicted that it would be close and could have gone either way when Justice O'Connor did the coin toss."

Fire It Up

Since my predictions go so well, USC 41 - Texas 23.

Football and homebrewed beer. Respect.

A New Feature: Asshole of the Week

I have respect for those who are, from time to time, unapologetic assholes. To celebrate that spirit, every Wednesday I'm going to post the most outlandish thing I've read in the past week. I intend the link itself to indicate neither endorsement nor disagreement with the position taken. Rather, it reflects a sense of awe at the author's success in embracing their inner misnathrope.

This week's winner: Slate Magazine's Steven Landsburg, who asks "Do the Poor Deserve Life Support?" and unapologetically answers "not unless they pay for it." I'd quote the most assaholic passage, but the would be just reposting the whole thing. And that violates copywrite laws, so go read it if you are inclined.

Market-libertarians say Duh. If one makes poor health care choices, thems the breaks. Others are predictably not as sanguine. The piece itself is "condescending, juvenile, obtuse, and soul cankered . . . written by a native of Alpha Centauri trying to parody Ayn Rand." As for the author: "Steven Landsburg is a dick. And I respect that."

As for the article itself, I tend to agree with this analysis which suggests that Landsburg's analysis is flawed, perhaps intentionally so, by his desire to make a shocking prounouncement which will horrify Slate's left-leaning audience. Mission accomplished, I'd say.

Update: Pops asks if I'm taking nominations. Of course. I believe this is what TMQ calls "reader animadversion". I think there are one or two of you out there, go forth and animadvert.

Update #2: Greetings RIA's Readers. Nominations are open. I am always highly eligible for this award, though you might want to stay tuned for the forthcoming series 'Why Pooh is Wrong Today.'

Rules
#1 It's Not Just Being Yourself


Winners
1/4/06 - Steven Landsburg says "Pull the Plug for her own good."
1/11/06 - Banning Cold Beer
1/18/06 - Beisbol is veddy veddy dumb. Does this violate rule #1?
1/25/06 - Big TelCo's
2/1/06 - SuperBowl XL Edition: Joey Porter Won't Shut Up.
2/8/06 - Just Shut Up!
2/15/06 - Dead-Eye Dick
2/22/06 - Idiot E-Mails
3/1/06 - Fletcher Ruins My TiVo
3/8/06 - Best. Prank. Ever.
3/22/06 - Alfonso Soriano
4/5/06 - Cynthia McKinney
4/19/06 - Brett Favre. Follow up
4/26/06 - GOP Softball
5/3/06 - Johnny F****** Damon
5/11/06 - $100K Blogfine? At least Cuban can afford it...

Nominees
1/24/06 - Runners-up
1/31/06 - Nominations Bleg
3/8/06 - Hagel, Snowe, Dewine. Spineless.

Tuesday, January 03, 2006

Fine, I'll Make a Movie List

So, I was trying to put together a list of my favorite movies of 2005, and I realised how many of the films I wanted to see this year I just haven't seen. I could make a top 5 of that. So:

1. The Aristocrats - A movie that is completely made up of dirty jokes. And the kicker is, it's the same dirty joke every time. As the Guiness Guys might say...

2. Good Night and Good Luck - The McCarthy Era has always kinda fascinated me. As has B&W coolness. Plus it's just supposed to be good.

3. Walk the Line - But I might refuse. Some people refused to see it on ideological grounds. Joachin Phoenix as the Man in Black just ain't right, they say. 'They' might be right. [Update: As usual, I didn't let facts get in the way of a good story. The Tall Fella has indeed seen Walk the Line. I had him confused with another friend of ours who refused to see any Lord of the Rings movies on principle because his father used to read them as bedtime stories. To quote "No one protests Jordan-like...except...you know, Jordan." My bad.]

4. Hustle & Flow - A Hip-Hop movie my mom liked. Like the above, this could cut either way. Terrance Howard is in it though, so that helps.

5. Into the Blue - Jessica Alba. Bikini. Need I say more? Bound to be a TNT "New 'Classic'". I can't wait to hear Chucky's intro the first time they show it after "Inside the NBA".

Top 1 Movie I really have no desire to see - Brokeback Mountain. It's not that it's the 'gay cowboy movie'. It's that this has got to be, hands-down the biggest chick-flick since "Titanic." I'm sure mom will love it though. (I rest my case).

As for the top ten I did see in 2005:

1. Serenity - Just nifty. Summer Glau kicking ass = best fight scene of the year.

2. Murderball - Pantheon level sports movie, regardless of the 'human interest' element.

3. Syrianna - My review here.

4. Layer Cake - Here's what I said about it about a month ago:
A quality film. Takes some of the sensibility of Snatch and Lock Stock and Two Smoking Barrels and imposes a bit of narrative structure. So well crafted that you never notice the fact that the protagonist is lacking something vital until the last line of the movie.
5. Crash - Ludacris is phenomenal. Who knew?

6. Wedding Crashers - The 5th of Captain with the industrial-sized movie theatre Coke may have helped. Your mileage may vary.

7. Mr. & Mrs. Smith - Good, wicked fun. Brad and Angie have amazing on screen chemistry. Sorry Jen, you lose.

8. Batman Begins - Would be higher if not for the ludicrous Katie Holmes 'silver-shirt' scene.

9. Flightplan - Huge Jody Foster fan. Well done thriller. As with most, a few gaping plot wholes that you don't notice during, but only upon review. Law of economy of characters also provides obvious villain.

10. Kingdom of Heaven - If this had Russel Crowe instead of Legolas in the lead, would have been best film of the year. Loved the portrayal of Saladin.

I Am the Anti-Dave Matthews

So little to say, So little to say, etc.

This is a profoundly new phenomenon for me. Actually, I have a lot to say, I'm just not sure I want to say a lot of it. But what can you do?

Monday, January 02, 2006

Sony Loves Company

Virgin Records has joined the "Fuck You, Music Lovers" campaign.



Note that this disclosure is only visible once one opens the CD, where one is informed
Except for manufacturing problems, we do not accept product exchange, return or refund.
Of course, I might describe a CD that, you know, doesn't play in my CD player as having a 'manufacturing problem', but somehow I think that Virgin views it differently. Of course, since I think Cold Play is pretentious shite this doesn't affect me. (and looking at Virgin's Roster of 'talent', it's unclear that it will ever. Except for *sigh* The Stones.)

My general New Years "Everything is crap" mood is not helped by this in the least.

(h/t: Prof. Solove)

Sunday, January 01, 2006

Happy New Year

Yup.

I'm feeling neither especially happy nor new today. Discuss...